Albuquerque set two weather records in two months, and they pulled in opposite directions. August was the hottest August on record in Albuquerque, averaging 82.5 degrees at the Sunport. September was the wettest September on record, with 4.49 inches of rain, nearly four times normal.
A dry river under a hot sky
Through Aug. 28 the Sunport recorded 0.12 inch of rain, about a tenth of a normal August. The U.S. Geological Survey gauge on the Rio Grande in Albuquerque recorded no flow at all on every day from July 26 through Sept. 3. By Aug. 30, 112.4 miles of the river between Cochiti and Elephant Butte were dry, the most since at least 2007.
Then two weeks of rain
Through Sept. 13, the Sunport had two hundredths of an inch. Then a run of storms, fed late in the month by the remnants of Hurricane Polo, dropped 4.47 inches in 17 days.
The month’s 4.49 inches, almost all of it from that 17-day run, broke Albuquerque’s September record of 3.97 inches, set in 2013.
- This year
- Normal
Running total of daily precipitation at the Albuquerque Sunport, Aug. 1 to Sept. 30, 2026, against the 1991-2020 daily normals. A trace counts as zero. Source: NOAA Regional Climate Centers' ACIS, Albuquerque area record, pulled Oct. 5, 2026.
Show the numbers
| Day | This year | Normal |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 1 | 0.00 | 0.06 |
| 0.00 | 0.11 | |
| 0.00 | 0.17 | |
| 0.00 | 0.22 | |
| 0.00 | 0.27 | |
| 0.00 | 0.33 | |
| 0.00 | 0.38 | |
| 0.00 | 0.42 | |
| 0.00 | 0.47 | |
| 0.00 | 0.52 | |
| 0.00 | 0.56 | |
| 0.00 | 0.61 | |
| 0.00 | 0.65 | |
| 0.06 | 0.70 | |
| Aug 15 | 0.06 | 0.74 |
| 0.06 | 0.78 | |
| 0.11 | 0.82 | |
| 0.11 | 0.86 | |
| 0.12 | 0.89 | |
| 0.12 | 0.92 | |
| 0.12 | 0.96 | |
| 0.12 | 0.99 | |
| 0.12 | 1.02 | |
| 0.12 | 1.06 | |
| 0.12 | 1.09 | |
| 0.12 | 1.13 | |
| 0.12 | 1.17 | |
| 0.12 | 1.20 | |
| 0.29 | 1.24 | |
| 0.29 | 1.27 | |
| 0.67 | 1.31 | |
| Sep 1 | 0.68 | 1.35 |
| 0.68 | 1.39 | |
| 0.68 | 1.43 | |
| 0.68 | 1.46 | |
| 0.68 | 1.50 | |
| 0.68 | 1.54 | |
| 0.68 | 1.58 | |
| 0.69 | 1.62 | |
| 0.69 | 1.66 | |
| 0.69 | 1.70 | |
| 0.69 | 1.74 | |
| 0.69 | 1.78 | |
| 0.69 | 1.81 | |
| 1.10 | 1.85 | |
| Sep 15 | 1.10 | 1.89 |
| 1.27 | 1.93 | |
| 1.68 | 1.97 | |
| 2.66 | 2.00 | |
| 2.67 | 2.04 | |
| 2.67 | 2.08 | |
| 2.67 | 2.12 | |
| 3.14 | 2.16 | |
| 3.87 | 2.20 | |
| 3.91 | 2.24 | |
| 3.98 | 2.28 | |
| 3.98 | 2.32 | |
| 3.98 | 2.35 | |
| 4.19 | 2.39 | |
| 5.16 | 2.43 | |
| Sep 30 | 5.16 | 2.46 |
The river is back. The drought is not over.
By Sept. 29 the gauge was running at 1,510 cubic feet a second, a provisional reading. The Sept. 29 drought monitor moved Bernalillo County from extreme to severe drought, one level better.
Before the rain came, Brian Guyer, a meteorologist with the weather service, wrote in a statement to the Daily Lobo that recovering would take “more than just one above normal winter season as impacts to area rivers, groundwater supply, and reservoir levels have been severe.”
Updated Oct. 14, 2026: We revised this story to source its facts to public records where we could, and removed details and quotes we could not confirm from a record.
Reader comments
What do you think?
Burqueños know this city best. Add what you've seen, ask a question, or push back on the story.
Loading comments…
New here? Sign up with your email. Confirm it and you're in, no password.
Comments are closed on this story.
Comments are the commenter's own words, not the Ledger's. Comment rules