Saturday, October 24, 2026 Sat, Oct 24 Albuquerque, N.M.
Search About Standards
🍕 Buy us a slice 🌶️
Duke City Ledger We read the fine print. You're welcome.
🍕 Buy us a slice 🌶️ Get the newsletter

Voter guide · Bernalillo County

What's on your ballot November 3

Your races, judges and ballot questions, in plain words.

Updated

Burque Bookie: what the betting markets give each race

New · Beta Speed dating for your ballot: every race, one card at a time. Swipe my ballot Free, no sign-up.

See only your races

Enter your address and the guide hides the races you won't see.

Anywhere in New Mexico works. Or

The Ledger never sees your address. How this works

When to vote

Every date, from registration to Election Day

  1. Tue Oct 6

    Registration closes and early voting opens

    Last day to register to vote online or on paper. Absentee ballots go out. Early voting and same-day registration open at the Clerk's Annex, 1500 Lomas Blvd NW, Suite A, weekdays 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. The Annex is closed Monday, October 12, for Indigenous Peoples' Day.

    Today

  2. Sat Oct 17 – Oct 31

    Early voting at every site

    Early voting and same-day registration at every early voting site. Most are open Monday to Saturday, 10 a.m. to 7 p.m.

    Today

  3. Tue Oct 20

    Last day to ask for an absentee ballot

    Apply online through the Secretary of State with a New Mexico driver's license or state ID, or ask the Clerk's office for a paper application.

    Today

  4. Tue Oct 27

    Mail your absentee ballot back

    Last day the Clerk recommends mailing an absentee ballot back. After that, drop it off at any voting site or drop box.

    Today

  5. Tue Nov 3

    Election Day

    Election Day. Every voting site is open 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. You can register and vote the same day. Absentee ballots are due by 7 p.m.

    Today
Check your registration And see your own sample ballot at the Secretary of State's voter portal. Find a voting site Vote at any site in the county, early or on Election Day. Vote by mail Ask for an absentee ballot by October 20.

Who is running

Tap a race to see who's running and mark your pick.

Congress

U.S. Senate

Lujan (D) vs. Marker (R)
Luján vs. Marker, issue by issue
Money and background, U.S. Senate

U.S. House, District 1

Stansbury (D) vs. Okpareke (R)
Stansbury vs. Okpareke, issue by issue
Money and background, U.S. House, District 1

U.S. House, District 2

Cunningham (R) vs. Vasquez (D)
Vasquez vs. Cunningham, issue by issue
Money and background, U.S. House, District 2

Statewide offices

Governor and Lieutenant Governor

Hull (R) vs. Haaland (D)
Haaland vs. Hull, issue by issue
Money and background, Governor and Lieutenant Governor

Attorney General

Torrez (D) vs. Kane, Sr. (R)
Torrez vs. Kane, issue by issue
Money and background, Attorney General

Secretary of State

LĂłpez Askin (D) vs. Goolsby (R)
LĂłpez Askin vs. Goolsby, issue by issue
Money and background, Secretary of State

State Auditor

Lawrence (R) vs. Maestas (D)
Maestas vs. Lawrence, issue by issue
Money and background, State Auditor

State Treasurer

Ellison (R) vs. Montoya (D)
Montoya vs. Ellison, issue by issue
Money and background, State Treasurer

Commissioner of Public Lands

Perry (R) vs. Sanchez, III (D)
Sanchez vs. Perry, issue by issue
Money and background, Commissioner of Public Lands

State Legislature

State House, District 10

Romero (D) vs. Crane (R)
Romero vs. Crane, issue by issue
Money and background, State House, District 10

State House, District 12

De La Cruz (D) vs. Tafoya (R)
De La Cruz vs. Tafoya, issue by issue
Money and background, State House, District 12

State House, District 14

Garcia (D) vs. Zubia (R)
Garcia vs. Zubia, issue by issue
Money and background, State House, District 14

State House, District 17

Borrego (D) vs. Boatman (R)
Borrego vs. Boatman, issue by issue
Money and background, State House, District 17

State House, District 21

Mason (R) vs. Sarinana (D)
Sariñana vs. Mason, issue by issue
Money and background, State House, District 21

State House, District 22

Lord (R) vs. Withers (no party) vs. Scott (D)
Lord vs. Withers vs. Scott, issue by issue
Money and background, State House, District 22

State House, District 25

Litvinenko (R) vs. Parajon (D)
Parajon vs. Litvinenko, issue by issue
Money and background, State House, District 25

State House, District 26

Chavez (D) vs. Zimmerman (R)
Chavez vs. Zimmerman, issue by issue
Money and background, State House, District 26

State House, District 27

Garcia (R) vs. Foster (D)
Foster vs. Garcia, issue by issue
Money and background, State House, District 27

State House, District 28

Herndon (D) vs. Olson (R)
Herndon vs. Olson, issue by issue
Money and background, State House, District 28

State House, District 29

Garratt (D) vs. Stith (R)
Garratt vs. Stith, issue by issue
Money and background, State House, District 29

State House, District 30

Trujillo (R) vs. Torres-Velasquez (D)
Torres-Velasquez vs. Trujillo, issue by issue
Money and background, State House, District 30

State House, District 31

Chavez (R) vs. Curtis (D)
Curtis vs. Chavez, issue by issue
Money and background, State House, District 31

State House, District 44

Cates (D) vs. Prior (R)
Cates vs. Prior, issue by issue
Money and background, State House, District 44

State House, District 68

Little (D) vs. Adkins (R)
Little vs. Adkins, issue by issue
Money and background, State House, District 68
Running unopposed 9 races with one candidate
  • State House, District 11
  • State House, District 13
  • State House, District 15
  • State House, District 16
  • State House, District 18
  • State House, District 19
  • State House, District 20
  • State House, District 24
  • State House, District 69

Public Education Commission

Public Education Commission, District 3

Dinge (forward) vs. Trujillo (D)
Trujillo vs. Dinge, issue by issue
Money and background, Public Education Commission, District 3
Running unopposed 3 races with one candidate
  • Public Education Commission, District 2
  • Public Education Commission, District 5
  • Public Education Commission, District 6

Bernalillo County

County Commission, District 5

Riley (R) vs. Olivas (D)
Olivas vs. Riley, issue by issue
Money and background, County Commission, District 5

County Assessor

Maine (R) vs. Stover (D)
Stover vs. Maine, issue by issue
Money and background, County Assessor
Running unopposed 3 races with one candidate
  • County Commission, District 1
  • County Sheriff
  • Probate Judge

Judges

Metropolitan Court Judge, Division 5

Maestas (D) vs. Morris (R)
Money and background, Metropolitan Court Judge, Division 5
Running unopposed 6 races with one candidate
  • Court of Appeals, Position 1
  • District Court Judge, Second Judicial District, Division 2
  • District Court Judge, Second Judicial District, Division 11
  • District Court Judge, Second Judicial District, Division 19
  • District Court Judge, Second Judicial District, Division 24
  • Metropolitan Court Judge, Division 19

The judges up for retention

Vote yes to retain a judge or no to remove them. A judge needs 57% yes to stay.

New Mexico Supreme Court

David K. Thomson Justice of the Supreme Court

Commission: retain Lawyers 81%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 5 areas, 81% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Exhibits Integrity
Highest rated Professional Demeanor

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 3 statewide judges up for retention whom attorneys rated in that area. 112 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, David K. Thomson
How 112 lawyers rated Thomson

What the commission said

Justice David K. Thomson received an overall positive evaluation. For example, attorneys rated him positively for providing court participants with a meaningful opportunity to be heard, treating courtroom participants with respect, and for performing duties fairly and impartially. The court staff rated Justice Thompson very highly on every attribute.
Court Staff (15 responded, 19% of those asked)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 97% 3% 0%
Application / Knowledge of Law 100% 0% 0%
Respects Court Employees 100% 0% 0%
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Timeliness of Rulings 86% 14% 0%
Appellate Judges (11 responded, 73% of those asked)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Exhibits Integrity 78% 20% 2%
Fair and Impartial 90% 10% 0%
Application / Knowledge of Law 90% 10% 0%
Respects Court Employees 80% 20% 0%
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Timeliness of Rulings 63% 25% 13%
District Judges (31 responded, 39% of those asked)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Exhibits Integrity 73% 16% 10%
Application / Knowledge of Law 68% 10% 23%
Timeliness of Rulings 55% 21% 24%
The commission's full evaluation

Shannon Bacon Justice of the Supreme Court

Commission: retain Lawyers 72%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 5 areas, 72% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Professional Demeanor
Highest rated Timeliness of Rulings

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 3 statewide judges up for retention whom attorneys rated in that area. 119 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, Shannon Bacon
How 119 lawyers rated Bacon

What the commission said

Justice C. Shannon Bacon’s overall results are mostly positive. For example, attorneys rated the Justice positively for being prepared for oral arguments and court proceedings, being knowledgeable regarding substantive law, following the legal rules that applied to the case at issue, and for providing court participants with a meaningful opportunity to be heard. The court staff and her fellow appellate judges/justices rated her positively in all areas.
Court Staff (14 responded, 17% of those asked)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 79% 11% 10%
Application / Knowledge of Law 86% 0% 14%
Respects Court Employees 100% 0% 0%
Professional Demeanor 93% 0% 7%
Timeliness of Rulings 100% 0% 0%
Appellate Judges (11 responded, 73% of those asked)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Exhibits Integrity 79% 20% 1%
Fair and Impartial 90% 10% 0%
Application / Knowledge of Law 100% 0% 0%
Respects Court Employees 75% 13% 13%
Professional Demeanor 78% 22% 0%
Timeliness of Rulings 70% 20% 10%
District Judges (28 responded, 35% of those asked)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Exhibits Integrity 74% 17% 9%
Application / Knowledge of Law 56% 30% 15%
Timeliness of Rulings 62% 15% 23%
The commission's full evaluation

Court of Appeals

J. Miles Hanisee Judge of the Court of Appeals

Commission: retain Lawyers 79%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 5 areas, 79% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Exhibits Integrity
Highest rated Professional Demeanor

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 3 statewide judges up for retention whom attorneys rated in that area. 84 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, J. Miles Hanisee
How 84 lawyers rated Hanisee

What the commission said

Judge J. Miles Hanisee received quite positive ratings overall. For example, attorneys rated Judge Hanisee positively for treating participants with respect, maintaining professional demeanor in the courtroom, and for being prepared for oral arguments and court proceedings. The court staff and his fellow appellate judges/justices rated Judge Hanisee highly in all areas. In addition, the district judges gave him positive ratings.
Court Staff (14 responded, 20% of those asked)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 100% 0% 0%
Application / Knowledge of Law 100% 0% 0%
Respects Court Employees 93% 7% 0%
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Timeliness of Rulings 100% 0% 0%
Appellate Judges (13 responded, 87% of those asked)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Exhibits Integrity 90% 10% 0%
Fair and Impartial 92% 0% 8%
Application / Knowledge of Law 92% 0% 8%
Respects Court Employees 83% 17% 0%
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Timeliness of Rulings 100% 0% 0%
District Judges (17 responded, 21% of those asked)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Exhibits Integrity 82% 13% 5%
Application / Knowledge of Law 76% 18% 6%
Timeliness of Rulings 76% 12% 12%
The commission's full evaluation

Second Judicial District Court

William Edward Parnall Division 1

Commission: retain Lawyers 76%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 6 areas, 76% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Communication Is Clear
Highest rated Exhibits Integrity

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 20 judges on a Bernalillo County ballot whom attorneys rated in that area. 32 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, William Edward Parnall
How 32 lawyers rated Parnall

What the commission said

Judge William Parnall received positive ratings overall. For example, attorneys rated him positively for conducting himself in a manner free from impropriety, treating self-represented parties fairly, being punctual in commencing proceedings, and for ensuring his personal staff is professional, productive, and knowledgeable of court policies and procedures. In addition, the court staff and resource staff (e.g., law enforcement, probation/parole, CASA volunteers, CYFD, interpreters, etc.) rated Judge Parnall positively in all areas.
Court Staff (22 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Respects Court Employees 100% 0% 0%
Resource Staff (32 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 86% 4% 10%
Communication Is Clear 72% 17% 10%
Professional Demeanor 82% 14% 4%
Preparation and Attentiveness 84% 12% 4%
The commission's full evaluation

Beatrice J. Brickhouse Division 4

Commission: retain Lawyers 86%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 6 areas, 86% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Application / Knowledge of Law
Highest rated Preparation and Attentiveness

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 20 judges on a Bernalillo County ballot whom attorneys rated in that area. 148 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, Beatrice J. Brickhouse
How 148 lawyers rated Brickhouse

What the commission said

Judge Beatrice Brickhouse’s overall results were positive. For example, attorneys rated her highly for being attentive to the proceedings, maintaining proper control over the proceedings, being prepared for court proceedings, and for treating self-represented parties fairly. In addition, the court staff rated Judge Brickhouse positively on all attributes.
Court Staff (25 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Professional Demeanor 84% 12% 4%
Respects Court Employees 76% 16% 8%
The commission's full evaluation

Alma C. Garcia Roberson Division 7

Commission: retain Lawyers 78%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 6 areas, 78% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Application / Knowledge of Law
Highest rated Preparation and Attentiveness

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 20 judges on a Bernalillo County ballot whom attorneys rated in that area. 35 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, Alma C. Garcia Roberson
How 35 lawyers rated Garcia Roberson

What the commission said

Judge Alma Roberson received positive ratings from attorneys. For example, attorneys rated her positively for treating all courtroom participants with respect, being punctual in commencing proceedings, being attentive to proceedings, and for ensuring her personal staff is professional, productive, and knowledgeable of court policies and procedures. In addition, the court staff, jurors, and resource staff (e.g., law enforcement officers, CASA volunteers, CYFD, interpreters, etc.) rated Judge Roberson highly in all areas.
Court Staff (25 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Respects Court Employees 100% 0% 0%
Jurors (5 responded, 36% of those asked)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 100% 0% 0%
Communication Is Clear 100% 0% 0%
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Preparation and Attentiveness 100% 0% 0%
Resource Staff (33 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 93% 5% 2%
Communication Is Clear 94% 6% 0%
Professional Demeanor 93% 7% 0%
Preparation and Attentiveness 94% 6% 0%
The commission's full evaluation

Bruce C. Fox Division 10

Commission: retain Lawyers 77%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 6 areas, 77% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Communication Is Clear
Highest rated Professional Demeanor

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 20 judges on a Bernalillo County ballot whom attorneys rated in that area. 64 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, Bruce C. Fox
How 64 lawyers rated Fox

What the commission said

Judge Bruce Fox’s scores among the attorneys were somewhat mixed. For example, attorneys rated Judge Fox positively for treating all courtroom participants with respect, treating self-represented parties fairly, and for being attentive to the proceedings. However, Judge Fox received lower scores for maintaining proper control over the proceedings, promptness in scheduling hearings and trials, and ruling on motions or cases in a timely manner. The court staff, jurors, and resource staff (e.g., law enforcement officers, CASA volunteers, CYFD, interpreters, etc.) rated Judge Fox positively on all attributes. During his interview with the Commission, Judge Fox acknowledged his need for improvement in the areas identified within the attorney survey results, and he provided the Commission with a plan for the same.
Court Staff (38 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Professional Demeanor 92% 8% 0%
Respects Court Employees 92% 5% 3%
Jurors (59 responded, 35% of those asked)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 98% 1% 2%
Communication Is Clear 96% 2% 2%
Professional Demeanor 97% 3% 0%
Preparation and Attentiveness 93% 4% 3%
Resource Staff (9 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 90% 0% 10%
Communication Is Clear 88% 13% 0%
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Preparation and Attentiveness 100% 0% 0%
The commission's full evaluation

Lisa Chavez Ortega Division 13

Commission: retain Lawyers 92%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 6 areas, 92% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Application / Knowledge of Law
Highest rated Preparation and Attentiveness

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 20 judges on a Bernalillo County ballot whom attorneys rated in that area. 111 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, Lisa Chavez Ortega
How 111 lawyers rated Ortega

What the commission said

Judge Lisa Chavez Ortega received a very positive evaluation. Judge Ortega received high ratings from attorneys for maintaining professional demeanor in the courtroom, treating all courtroom participants with respect, ensuring that participants understand the court proceedings, and for ensuring her personal staff are professional, productive, and knowledgeable of court policies and procedures. Judge Ortega received high ratings from the court staff and jurors in all areas.
Court Staff (26 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Professional Demeanor 96% 0% 4%
Respects Court Employees 96% 0% 4%
Jurors (19 responded, 53% of those asked)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 100% 0% 0%
Communication Is Clear 100% 0% 0%
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Preparation and Attentiveness 100% 0% 0%
The commission's full evaluation

Jennifer J. Wernersbach Division 16

Commission: retain Lawyers 74%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 6 areas, 74% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Application / Knowledge of Law
Highest rated Preparation and Attentiveness

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 20 judges on a Bernalillo County ballot whom attorneys rated in that area. 63 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, Jennifer J. Wernersbach
How 63 lawyers rated Wernersbach

What the commission said

Judge Jennifer Wernersbach received generally positive ratings among attorneys. For example, attorneys rated her positively for attentiveness to court proceedings, treating self-represented parties fairly, and for ensuring that parties understand court proceedings. They also rated her positively for ensuring her personal staff is professional, productive, and knowledgeable of court policies and procedures. Court staff and jurors rated Judge Wernersbach highly in every area. Resource staff (e.g., law enforcement officers, CASA volunteers, CYFD, interpreters, etc.) gave her positive ratings. In addition, it is worth noting that her scores improved in almost every category when compared to her 2023 evaluation.
Court Staff (29 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Professional Demeanor 97% 3% 0%
Respects Court Employees 97% 3% 0%
Jurors (15 responded, 26% of those asked)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 98% 0% 2%
Communication Is Clear 98% 2% 0%
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Preparation and Attentiveness 100% 0% 0%
Resource Staff (13 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 83% 10% 7%
Communication Is Clear 80% 10% 10%
Professional Demeanor 89% 11% 0%
Preparation and Attentiveness 90% 0% 10%
The commission's full evaluation

Amber Louisee Chavez Baker Division 22

Commission: retain Lawyers 88%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 6 areas, 88% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Communication Is Clear
Highest rated Preparation and Attentiveness

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 20 judges on a Bernalillo County ballot whom attorneys rated in that area. 100 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, Amber Louisee Chavez Baker
How 100 lawyers rated Chavez Baker

What the commission said

Overall, Judge Amber Chavez Baker’s evaluation was positive. For example, attorneys rated her highly for treating self-represented parties fairly, ensuring that participants understand the court proceedings, treating all courtroom participants with respect, and for ensuring her personal staff is professional, productive, and knowledgeable of court policies and procedures. The court staff rated Judge Chavez Baker very highly on all attributes.
Court Staff (32 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Respects Court Employees 100% 0% 0%
The commission's full evaluation

Jane Conway Levy Division 25

Commission: retain Lawyers 92%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 5 areas, 92% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Fair and Impartial
Highest rated Preparation and Attentiveness

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 20 judges on a Bernalillo County ballot whom attorneys rated in that area. 114 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, Jane Conway Levy
How 114 lawyers rated Levy

What the commission said

Judge Jane Levy received a very positive overall evaluation. Judge Levy received high ratings from attorneys for being attentive to the proceedings, punctuality in commencing proceedings, being prepared for court proceedings, and for treating self-represented parties fairly. In addition, the court staff rated Judge Levy highly on all attributes.
Court Staff (34 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Respects Court Employees 94% 6% 0%
The commission's full evaluation

Clara M. Moran Division 28

Commission: retain Lawyers 81%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 6 areas, 81% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Application / Knowledge of Law
Highest rated Professional Demeanor

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 20 judges on a Bernalillo County ballot whom attorneys rated in that area. 60 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, Clara M. Moran
How 60 lawyers rated Moran

What the commission said

Overall, Judge Clara Moran’s scores were generally positive. For example, attorneys rated her positively for maintaining a professional demeanor in the courtroom, ensuring that participants understand the court proceedings, treating self-represented parties fairly, and being attentive to the proceedings. The resource staff (e.g., law enforcement officers, CASA volunteers, CYFD, interpreters, etc.) and court staff rated her positively on all attributes. Additionally, the jurors gave Judge Moran very positive ratings.
Court Staff (36 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Professional Demeanor 77% 14% 9%
Respects Court Employees 72% 17% 11%
Jurors (21 responded, 36% of those asked)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 100% 0% 0%
Communication Is Clear 100% 0% 0%
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Preparation and Attentiveness 100% 0% 0%
Resource Staff (8 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 94% 6% 0%
Communication Is Clear 100% 0% 0%
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Preparation and Attentiveness 100% 0% 0%
The commission's full evaluation

Metropolitan Court

Christine Eve Rodriguez Division 2

Commission: retain Lawyers 94%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 6 areas, 94% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Application / Knowledge of Law
Highest rated Preparation and Attentiveness

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 20 judges on a Bernalillo County ballot whom attorneys rated in that area. 26 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, Christine Eve Rodriguez
How 26 lawyers rated Rodriguez

What the commission said

Overall, Judge Christine E. Rodriguez’s evaluation was very positive. For example, attorneys rated her highly for treating all courtroom participants with respect, treating pro se parties fairly, being prepared for court proceedings, and for being attentive to the proceedings. In addition, court staff rated her positively on every attribute.
Court Staff (31 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Respects Court Employees 100% 0% 0%
Jurors (3 responded, 14% of those asked)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 100% 0% 0%
Communication Is Clear 100% 0% 0%
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Preparation and Attentiveness 100% 0% 0%
Resource Staff (10 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 90% 0% 10%
Communication Is Clear 90% 0% 10%
Professional Demeanor 90% 0% 10%
Preparation and Attentiveness 85% 5% 10%
The commission's full evaluation

Joshua J. Sanchez Division 4

Commission: retain Lawyers 86%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 6 areas, 86% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Application / Knowledge of Law
Highest rated Preparation and Attentiveness

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 20 judges on a Bernalillo County ballot whom attorneys rated in that area. 43 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, Joshua J. Sanchez
How 43 lawyers rated Sanchez

What the commission said

Judge Joshua J. Sanchez’s survey results were quite positive. For example, attorneys rated Judge Sanchez highly for being attentive to the proceedings, for treating all courtroom participants with respect, for treating pro se parties fairly, ensuring that participants understand the court proceedings, and for ensuring his personal staff is professional, productive, and knowledgeable of court policies and procedures. The court staff also rated Judge Sanchez very highly in all areas.
Court Staff (42 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Professional Demeanor 98% 2% 0%
Respects Court Employees 98% 2% 0%
Resource Staff (13 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 92% 0% 8%
Communication Is Clear 92% 0% 8%
Professional Demeanor 92% 0% 8%
Preparation and Attentiveness 92% 0% 8%
The commission's full evaluation

Jill Martinez Division 8

Commission: retain Lawyers 83%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 6 areas, 83% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Application / Knowledge of Law
Highest rated Preparation and Attentiveness

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 20 judges on a Bernalillo County ballot whom attorneys rated in that area. 37 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, Jill Martinez
How 37 lawyers rated Martinez

What the commission said

Overall, Judge Jill M. Martinez’s scores are positive. For example, attorneys rated her positively for being prepared for court proceedings, being attentive to the proceedings, treating pro se parties fairly, and for ensuring her personal staff is professional, productive, and knowledgeable of court policies and procedures. In addition, the court staff rated her positively in all areas.
Court Staff (25 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Professional Demeanor 80% 12% 8%
Respects Court Employees 80% 12% 8%
Resource Staff (10 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 66% 14% 20%
Communication Is Clear 67% 11% 22%
Professional Demeanor 67% 11% 22%
Preparation and Attentiveness 67% 22% 11%
The commission's full evaluation

Brittany Maldonado Malott Division 10

Commission: retain Lawyers 94%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 6 areas, 94% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Application / Knowledge of Law
Highest rated Professional Demeanor

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 20 judges on a Bernalillo County ballot whom attorneys rated in that area. 33 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, Brittany Maldonado Malott
How 33 lawyers rated Maldonado Malott

What the commission said

Overall, Judge Brittany Maldonado Malott’s scores are quite positive. For example, attorneys rated her highly for maintaining professional demeanor in the courtroom, treating pro se parties fairly, being prepared for court proceedings, and for ensuring her personal staff is professional, productive, and knowledgeable of court policies and procedures. In addition, the court staff rated Judge Brittany Maldonado Malott highly on all attributes.
Court Staff (29 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Professional Demeanor 93% 3% 3%
Respects Court Employees 93% 3% 3%
Resource Staff (16 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 65% 19% 16%
Communication Is Clear 69% 19% 13%
Professional Demeanor 69% 25% 6%
Preparation and Attentiveness 59% 22% 19%
The commission's full evaluation

Jason M. Jaramillo Division 12

Commission: retain Lawyers 76%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 6 areas, 76% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Professional Demeanor
Highest rated Preparation and Attentiveness

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 20 judges on a Bernalillo County ballot whom attorneys rated in that area. 53 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, Jason M. Jaramillo
How 53 lawyers rated Jaramillo

What the commission said

Overall, Judge Jason M. Jaramillo’s scores are generally positive. For example, attorneys rated Judge Jaramillo positively for being attentive to the proceedings, being prepared for court proceedings, treating pro se parties fairly, and for ensuring his personal staff is professional, productive, and knowledgeable of court policies and procedures. In addition, the court staff gave Judge Jaramillo generally positive ratings for maintaining professional demeanor with court employees and ensuring personal staff are professional, productive, and knowledgeable of court policies and procedures.
Court Staff (20 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Professional Demeanor 65% 15% 20%
Respects Court Employees 60% 15% 25%
The commission's full evaluation

Vidalia G. Chavez Division 14

Commission: retain Lawyers 92%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 6 areas, 92% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Application / Knowledge of Law
Highest rated Preparation and Attentiveness

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 20 judges on a Bernalillo County ballot whom attorneys rated in that area. 36 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, Vidalia G. Chavez
How 36 lawyers rated Chavez

What the commission said

Overall, Judge Vidalia Chavez’s scores are quite positive. For example, attorneys rated her highly for maintaining professional demeanor in the courtroom, treating all courtroom participants with respect, treating pro se parties fairly, and for ensuring her personal staff is professional, productive, and knowledgeable of court policies and procedures. The evaluation also showed the court staff and jurors rated Judge Chavez highly in all areas.
Court Staff (29 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Professional Demeanor 97% 3% 0%
Respects Court Employees 93% 3% 3%
Jurors (6 responded, 29% of those asked)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 100% 0% 0%
Communication Is Clear 100% 0% 0%
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Preparation and Attentiveness 100% 0% 0%
Resource Staff (11 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 68% 19% 14%
Communication Is Clear 67% 22% 11%
Professional Demeanor 67% 22% 11%
Preparation and Attentiveness 67% 22% 11%
The commission's full evaluation

Claire Ann McDaniel Division 16

Commission: retain Lawyers 89%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 6 areas, 89% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Application / Knowledge of Law
Highest rated Preparation and Attentiveness

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 20 judges on a Bernalillo County ballot whom attorneys rated in that area. 42 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, Claire Ann McDaniel
How 42 lawyers rated McDaniel

What the commission said

Judge Claire Ann McDaniel’s overall survey results were positive. For example, attorneys rated her highly for being attentive to the proceedings, for treating all courtroom participants with respect, for treating pro se parties fairly, and for ensuring that participants understand the court proceedings. In addition, the court staff rated her positively in all areas.
Court Staff (24 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Professional Demeanor 92% 8% 0%
Respects Court Employees 96% 4% 0%
Resource Staff (13 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Fair and Impartial 62% 18% 20%
Communication Is Clear 63% 19% 19%
Professional Demeanor 67% 22% 11%
Preparation and Attentiveness 59% 17% 24%
The commission's full evaluation

Rosie Lazcano Allred Division 18

Commission: retain Lawyers 82%

The state's judicial review commission says retain. On average across 6 areas, 82% of lawyers surveyed rated this judge well.

Where this judge stands out

Lowest rated Application / Knowledge of Law
Highest rated Preparation and Attentiveness

The bar is this judge's share of attorneys who agree; the line marks the average across the 20 judges on a Bernalillo County ballot whom attorneys rated in that area. 51 attorneys answered for this judge.

Ratings, the commission's evaluation, Rosie Lazcano Allred
How 51 lawyers rated Allred

What the commission said

Judge Rosie Lazcano Allred’s scores are quite positive. For example, attorneys rated Judge Allred highly for being attentive to the proceedings, being punctual in commencing proceedings, for treating pro se parties fairly, and for ensuring her personal staff is professional, productive, and knowledgeable of court policies and procedures. In addition, the court staff rated Judge Allred highly in all areas.
Court Staff (18 responded)
Category Agree Partly Disagree
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Respects Court Employees 100% 0% 0%
The commission's full evaluation

District Court

The questions on the ballot

Tap a question to see what a yes or no vote does.

State bonds

Senior citizen facilities

Bond 1 $21.6 million to borrow
The ballot's wording, Senior citizen facilities
The 2026 Capital Projects General Obligation Bond Act authorizes the issuance and sale of senior citizen facility improvement, construction and equipment acquisition bonds. Shall the state be authorized to issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed twenty-one million five hundred eighty-two thousand two hundred thirteen dollars ($21,582,213) to make capital expenditures for certain senior citizen facility improvement, construction and equipment acquisition projects and provide for a general property tax imposition and levy for the payment of principal of, interest on and expenses incurred in connection with the issuance of the bonds and the collection of the tax as permitted by law?
The measure itself

Library acquisitions

Bond 2 $19.3 million to borrow
The ballot's wording, Library acquisitions
The 2026 Capital Projects General Obligation Bond Act authorizes the issuance and sale of library acquisition bonds. Shall the state be authorized to issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed nineteen million three hundred twenty-four thousand one hundred eighty-eight dollars ($19,324,188) to make capital expenditures for academic, public school, public and tribal library resource acquisitions and provide for a general property tax imposition and levy for the payment of principal of, interest on and expenses incurred in connection with the issuance of the bonds and the collection of the tax as permitted by law?
The measure itself

Colleges and special schools

Bond 3 $352.2 million to borrow
The ballot's wording, Colleges and special schools
The 2026 Capital Projects General Obligation Bond Act authorizes the issuance and sale of higher education, special schools and tribal schools capital improvement and acquisition bonds. Shall the state be authorized to issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed three hundred fifty-two million two hundred twenty-five thousand three hundred seventy-nine dollars ($352,225,379) to make capital expenditures for certain higher education, special schools and tribal schools capital improvements and acquisitions and provide for a general property tax imposition and levy for the payment of principal of, interest on and expenses incurred in connection with the issuance of the bonds and the collection of the tax as permitted by law?
The measure itself

Constitutional amendments

Veto explanations

Amendment 1
The ballot's wording, Veto explanations
Proposing an amendment to Article 4, Section 22 of the Constitution of New Mexico to require the governor to provide veto messages on all bills vetoed in whole or in part and to provide that all bills passed by the legislature and not acted on by the governor will become law.
The measure itself

School election dates

Amendment 2
The ballot's wording, School election dates
Proposing to amend Article 7, Section 1 of the Constitution of New Mexico to remove the requirement that school elections be separate from partisan elections.
The measure itself

Choosing university regents

Amendment 3
The ballot's wording, Choosing university regents
Proposing an amendment to Article 12, Section 13 of the Constitution of New Mexico to establish nominating committees to provide lists of nominees to the governor for appointment of nonstudent members to the boards of regents of state educational institutions; providing that student members of boards of regents shall be appointed from a list provided by an elected student governing body of the institution; providing that, except for a student member, members of the boards of regents shall not have changed their political party registration in the twelve months preceding appointment.
The measure itself

Pay for lawmakers

Amendment 4
The ballot's wording, Pay for lawmakers
Proposing to amend Article 4, Section 10 of the Constitution of New Mexico to allow legislative compensation that is limited to the median household income for New Mexico, to require legislative compensation to be reduced if the median household income for New Mexico falls, to allow legislative compensation to be increased only if the median household income for New Mexico rises and to provide for delayed implementation.
The measure itself

Bernalillo County bonds

Libraries

Bond 1 $2.5 million to borrow
The ballot's wording, Libraries
Shall Bernalillo County, New Mexico, be authorized to issue its general obligation bonds, in one series or more, in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding $2,500,000 for the purpose of purchasing materials and resources for libraries within Bernalillo County, New Mexico, said bonds to be payable from general (ad valorem) taxes, and to be issued and sold at such time or times and upon such terms and conditions as the Board of County Commissioners may determine and as permitted by law?
The measure itself

Public safety and county buildings

Bond 2 $8.9 million to borrow
The ballot's wording, Public safety and county buildings
Shall Bernalillo County, New Mexico, be authorized to issue its general obligation bonds, in one series or more, in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding $8,900,000 for the purpose of acquiring property, planning, designing, upgrading, constructing, remodeling, purchasing, furnishing, equipping, repairing and otherwise improving, County facilities and fleet, including but not limited to health and public safety facilities, fire station and law enforcement facilities, jail and detention center facilities, courthouse facilities, youth and family service center and learning facilities, visitors center facilities, necessary redevelopment of facilities, and replacement of fleet vehicles and heavy equipment, and construction and improvements required by the Americans with Disabilities Act, said bonds to be payable from general (ad valorem) taxes, and to be issued and sold at such time or times and upon such terms and conditions as the Board of County Commissioners may determine and as permitted by law?
The measure itself

Parks and recreation

Bond 3 $20.4 million to borrow
The ballot's wording, Parks and recreation
Shall Bernalillo County, New Mexico, be authorized to issue its general obligation bonds, in one series or more, in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding $20,384,920 for the purpose of acquiring property, planning, designing, upgrading, constructing, remodeling, furnishing, equipping, repairing and otherwise improving park and recreational facilities within the County, including but not limited to parks, aquatic centers, community centers, playgrounds, ball fields, open spaces, cultural and educational facilities, community recreation centers and pools, and necessary redevelopment of facilities, and construction and improvements required by the Americans with Disabilities Act, said bonds to be payable from general (ad valorem) taxes, and to be issued and sold at such time or times and upon such terms and conditions as the Board of County Commissioners may determine and as permitted by law?
The measure itself

Transportation

Bond 4 $6.2 million to borrow
The ballot's wording, Transportation
Shall Bernalillo County, New Mexico, be authorized to issue its general obligation bonds, in one series or more, in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding $6,215,080 for the purpose of acquiring property, planning, designing, upgrading, constructing, rehabilitating, furnishing, equipping, repairing and otherwise improving transportation facilities within the County, including but not limited to roads, non-motor vehicle pathways, bridges, traffic calming facilities, guardrails, bike lanes, trails, sidewalks, transit improvements, paving, landscaping, traffic signals and other street improvements, and necessary construction and improvements required by the Americans with Disabilities Act, said bonds to be payable from general (ad valorem) taxes, and to be issued and sold at such time or times and upon such terms and conditions as the Board of County Commissioners may determine and as permitted by law?
The measure itself

Storm drainage and utilities

Bond 5 $1 million to borrow
The ballot's wording, Storm drainage and utilities
Shall Bernalillo County, New Mexico, be authorized to issue its general obligation bonds, in one series or more, in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding $1,000,000 for the purpose of acquiring property, planning, designing, upgrading, constructing, rehabilitating, equipping, repairing and otherwise improving drainage and utility infrastructure, including but not limited to storm sewer and drainage, wastewater, water and drainage systems and facilities within Bernalillo County, New Mexico, said bonds to be payable from general (ad valorem) taxes, and to be issued and sold at such time or times and upon such terms and conditions as the Board of County Commissioners may determine and as permitted by law?
The measure itself

Public housing

Bond 6 $6 million to borrow
The ballot's wording, Public housing
Shall Bernalillo County, New Mexico, be authorized to issue its general obligation bonds, in one series or more, in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding $6,000,000 for the purpose of acquiring property, planning, designing, upgrading, constructing, remodeling, rehabilitating, furnishing, equipping, repairing and otherwise improving housing facilities within the County, said bonds to be payable from general (ad valorem) taxes, and to be issued and sold at such time or times and upon such terms and conditions as the Board of County Commissioners may determine and as permitted by law?
The measure itself

City of Albuquerque questions

On ballots inside Albuquerque city limits only.

Performing arts center vote

City question 1
The ballot's wording, Performing arts center vote
Shall the Charter of the City of Albuquerque be amended to repeal Article XI, Section 7, which requires voter approval before the City may appropriate more than $10 million for a performing arts center so that future funding of any amount would no longer require a separate vote?
The measure itself

Community Safety chief

City question 2
The ballot's wording, Community Safety chief
Shall the Charter of the City of Albuquerque be amended to designate the Director of Albuquerque Community Safety as the "ACS Chief" and require that this position be appointed by the Mayor with the advice and consent of the City Council, subject to the same confirmation, employment agreement, and removal terms currently applied to the Police Chief and Fire Chief?
The measure itself

Public safety tax split

City question 3
The ballot's wording, Public safety tax split
Shall the City of Albuquerque amend the Public Safety Gross Receipts Tax to divide funds amongst updated city services? The money would be divided as follows: Police 35%; Fire 38%; Albuquerque Community Safety 8%; Health, Housing, and Homelessness 8%; Prisoner Transport 6%; and Code Enforcement 5%. This would not increase the tax rate.
The measure itself

Flood control bond

On ballots inside the flood control authority's area only.

Flood control

Bond 1 $30 million to borrow
The ballot's wording, Flood control
Shall the Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority be authorized to issue its general obligation bonds in principal amount not exceeding $30,000,000 for the extension, betterment, alteration, reconstruction, repair and other improvements of the Authority's flood control system?
The measure itself

How this guide works

Your address
As you type, the address search asks the City of Albuquerque's address list and Esri's address search, which covers the whole state. An address neither knows goes to the Census Bureau's address search when you press Enter. Your districts are found on this page from the County Clerk's maps, or outside Bernalillo County from the Census Bureau's district maps. The Ledger never sees your address or your location. If you live near a district line, check the races against your own sample ballot.
Your picks
Picks stay on this page and are gone when you close it. Use Print my ballot to keep them. You don't need the printout to vote.
Candidates
49 races reach a Bernalillo County ballot, and 28 have more than one candidate. Elsewhere in New Mexico, the guide also lists the 49 U.S. House, State House, State Senate and Public Education Commission races there, and each county's countywide offices, magistrates and district judges (158 races and 23 judges up for retention). Districted county commission seats, magistrates elected by division (in Chaves, Curry, Eddy, Lea and San Juan counties), the Los Alamos County Council and other counties' bond questions aren't here yet. Names and ballot order are from the Secretary of State's candidate list as of October 1, 2026. The Bernalillo County races are checked against the county's sample ballot.
Money
Federal races show what each campaign's main committee raised in 2025 and 2026, or since its first report if that came later, from its reports to the Federal Election Commission, split by where the money came from. "Transfers and other" is mostly money passed on by other committees authorized to raise for the campaign, such as joint fundraising committees, plus smaller items like loans from banks and refunds. Money raised by those other committees is listed separately ("plus ... in other committees") so none is counted twice. State and county races show what each campaign raised since Oct. 7, 2025, or since its first report if that came later, from the Secretary of State's campaign finance system. Each candidate's dates are under their name. "No report yet" means no report covering a finished period was on file when the guide was updated; "No complete report yet" means the reports on file were filed before their periods ended.
Judges
Each judge needs 57% yes to stay. The state's Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission surveys the lawyers, court staff and others who work in front of each judge, and recommends retaining 20 of the 20 on a Bernalillo County ballot. Ratings are from its 2026 evaluations, read October 1, 2026. "Agree" combines agree and strongly agree. The lawyers' number on each judge is the Ledger's average of the share of lawyers who agreed in each area they rated; the commission publishes the areas, not the average. A rating the commission printed that does not add up to 100% is left out, including from the average.
Ballot questions
17 questions: bonds that let the state, the county or the flood control authority borrow money, amendments to the state constitution, and 3 City of Albuquerque questions, which are only on ballots inside city limits.
Where this came from: 110 sources

Where this came from

Where any of these differ from this page, go by the original.

  1. Elections Bernalillo County Clerk
  2. Early voting Bernalillo County Clerk
  3. Election Day voting Bernalillo County Clerk
  4. Absentee voting Bernalillo County Clerk
  5. 2026 General Election candidate list New Mexico Secretary of State
  6. House Bill 248 (2026), final text New Mexico Legislature
  7. House Joint Resolution 2 (2025), final text New Mexico Legislature
  8. House Joint Resolution 1 (2026), final text New Mexico Legislature
  9. House Joint Resolution 5 (2026), final text New Mexico Legislature
  10. Senate Joint Resolution 1 (2026), final text New Mexico Legislature
  11. 2026 general obligation bond questions and projects, $45 million Bernalillo County
  12. Resolution 2026-10, 2026 bond election Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority
  13. 2026 general election composite sample ballot Bernalillo County Clerk
  14. Political maps Bernalillo County Clerk
  15. AMAFCA board districts, map service Bernalillo County Clerk
  16. 2026 judicial evaluations New Mexico Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission
  17. 2026 retention recommendations New Mexico Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission
  18. City Council Bill P-25-8 Albuquerque City Council
  19. City Council Bill P-26-1 Albuquerque City Council
  20. City Council Bill R-26-29 Albuquerque City Council
  21. Campaign Finance Information System New Mexico Secretary of State
  22. Campaign finance data Federal Election Commission
  23. Legislators New Mexico Legislature
  24. Greggory D. Hull and David M. Gallegos: State Senator, District 41 (running mate David M. Gallegos) nmlegis.gov
  25. Deb Haaland and Stephanie Garcia Richard: Commissioner of Public Lands (running mate Stephanie Garcia Richard) nmstatelands.org
  26. Amanda López Askin: Doña Ana County Clerk donaana.gov
  27. Michael Jack Perry: Chaves County Commissioner, District 5 chavescounty.gov
  28. Jacob A. Trujillo: appointment web.ped.nm.gov
  29. Kris Houghton: appointment governor.state.nm.us
  30. Matthew Edwin Chavez: appointment governor.state.nm.us
  31. Bryan T. Fox: appointment seconddistrict.nmcourts.gov
  32. Diana Lynn Garcia: appointment governor.state.nm.us
  33. Crystal Emerald Lees: appointment governor.state.nm.us
  34. Ben R. Lujan: campaign finance filings Federal Election Commission
  35. Larry E. Marker: campaign finance filings Federal Election Commission
  36. Melanie Ann Stansbury: campaign finance filings Federal Election Commission
  37. Ndidiamaka Ekwua Charlene Okpareke: campaign finance filings Federal Election Commission
  38. Gregory G. Cunningham: campaign finance filings Federal Election Commission
  39. Gabriel Vasquez: campaign finance filings Federal Election Commission
  40. Greggory D. Hull and David M. Gallegos: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  41. Deb Haaland and Stephanie Garcia Richard: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  42. Raul Torrez: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  43. Samuel Isaiah Kane, Sr.: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  44. Amanda LĂłpez Askin: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  45. Ramona L. Goolsby: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  46. Joshua James Ryan Lawrence: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  47. Joseph M. Maestas: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  48. James F. Ellison: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  49. Laura M. Montoya: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  50. Michael Jack Perry: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  51. Juan De Jesus Sanchez, III: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  52. G. Andres Romero: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  53. Christopher P. Crane: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  54. Javier I. Martinez: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  55. Art De La Cruz: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  56. Steven E. Tafoya: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  57. Patricia A. Roybal Caballero: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  58. Miguel P. Garcia: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  59. Richard Victor Zubia: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  60. Dayan "Day" Mercedes Hochman-Vigil: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  61. Yanira Gurrola Valenzuela: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  62. Cynthia D. Borrego: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  63. Brenda Diane Boatman: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  64. Marianna A. Anaya: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  65. Janelle I. Anyanonu: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  66. Meredith A. Dixon: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  67. Robert L. Mason: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  68. Debra Marie Sarinana: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  69. Stefani Lord: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  70. Zachary P. Withers: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  71. William (Bill) Scott: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  72. Elizabeth L. Thomson: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  73. Denis Litvinenko: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  74. Cristina S. Parajon: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  75. Eleanor Chavez: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  76. Corey Rubin Zimmerman: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  77. Jahnelle Louise Garcia: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  78. Abby Christine Foster: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  79. Pamelya Paulette Herndon: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  80. Brenda J. Olson: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  81. Joy I. Garratt: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  82. Carolyn Stith: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  83. Jerry L. Trujillo: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  84. Elizabeth Diane Torres-Velasquez: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  85. Nicole Chavez: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  86. Lisa K. Curtis: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  87. Kathleen M. Cates: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  88. Adam Stanley Prior: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  89. Charlotte L. Little: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  90. David E. Adkins: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  91. Michelle Paulene Abeyta: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  92. Kenneth James Pascoe: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  93. Dennis C. Dinge: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  94. Jacob A. Trujillo: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  95. Sharon E. Clahchischilliage: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  96. Stewart Alan Ingham: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  97. Barbara Christine Baca: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  98. Thomas Wayne Riley: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  99. Eric Olivas: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  100. Michael Ray Maine: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  101. Linda Stover: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  102. John D. Allen: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  103. Kris Houghton: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  104. Matthew Edwin Chavez: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  105. Bryan T. Fox: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  106. Diana Lynn Garcia: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  107. Crystal Emerald Lees: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  108. Ramon J. Maestas: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  109. Kerry J. Morris: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State
  110. Andrea Inez Gunderson: campaign finance filings New Mexico Secretary of State