Saturday, October 24, 2026 Sat, Oct 24 Albuquerque, N.M.
Duke City Ledger We read the fine print. You're welcome.
Government

The council set aside $8.2 million for city worker raises. The mayor's office says that money isn't real yet and warned of layoffs.

Mayor Tim Keller refused to sign the budget. Whether the money is there depends on last year's final numbers, which the city hasn't posted.

What the public records and data show, with the sources listed at the end. How we label stories Found and written by our AI desk, then read and checked by the editor before it went up. How we label stories
A tall modernist office block with a grid facade on a downtown corner, the Bernalillo County government building beside it
Albuquerque City Hall at 400 Marquette NW, where the council passed its own version of the fiscal 2027 budget 7-2. Photo: AllenS · Public domain

The short version

  • The council set aside $8.2 million for city worker raises: a cost-of-living raise and a pay floor for full-time jobs.
  • It is counting on money left over from last year. Keller's finance chief called that money "unrealized" and warned of layoffs.
  • Last year's final numbers will show whether the money is there. The city hasn't posted them.

The City Council’s budget for this year sets aside $8.2 million for raises for city workers, the adopted budget book shows.

  • $4.5 million for a cost-of-living raise. Firefighters’ union positions are left out.
  • $3.7 million to bring every full-time job up to a pay floor, the 25th percentile of the city’s pay study.

Where the money comes from

The council is counting on money it expects to be left over from last year, about $11.1 million. The budget book calls it expected underspending from the year that ended June 30, meaning money city departments are expected not to spend.

Why the mayor’s office is worried

  • Keller’s chief financial officer, Carla Martinez, called the money an “unrealized amount” in May, meaning the city doesn’t have it in hand. She warned it could lead to layoffs and hurt the city’s credit rating, City Desk ABQ reported.
  • Keller said he was concerned the council built the budget around an “overly-optimistic forecast that could put core services at risk,” City Desk reported.
  • The budget is built “on shaky ground with uncertain forecasts and high risk assumptions” and may need “major revisions or even cuts” by fall, Keller said, KOB reported.

Why the council says it’s fine

  • The council says its staff found money left over from last year that Keller’s own budget left out.
  • The council says the state finance department confirmed its staff’s assessment. Martinez disputed that in May, City Desk reported.
  • “When the fiscal year closes, we are assured that the funding is waiting for them,” Councilor RenĂ©e Grout said in the council’s May 14 release.

Keller refused to sign it

The council passed its budget 7-2 on May 18. Councilors Dan Lewis and Brook Bassan voted no. Keller refused to sign it, and it became law without his signature.

What happens next

The city hasn’t posted its final numbers for last year. Those will show whether the money is there.

The last spending update it did post, using data available in March, projected last year would run $11.1 million over budget. Fire was projected $8 million over and police $4.4 million over, the third-quarter report shows.

Keller has already said the budget may need those revisions by this fall.

Updated Oct. 14, 2026: We revised this story to source its facts to public records where we could, and removed details and quotes we could not confirm from a record.

Read next Government AI reads the official record of each meeting and tells you what it means for you. Here's how we check every summary, and how to tell us if one is wrong. 4 min read

Reader comments

What do you think?

Burqueños know this city best. Add what you've seen, ask a question, or push back on the story.

Loading comments…

Sign in to comment

New here? Sign up with your email. Confirm it and you're in, no password.

Comments are the commenter's own words, not the Ledger's. Comment rules

Where this came from

This story draws on the reporting and public records listed here. Where they differ from this page, go by the original.

  1. FY/27 Approved Budget City of Albuquerque
  2. Revenue & Expense Report for Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 (EC-26-213) City of Albuquerque
  3. EC-26-213: Revenue & Expense Report for Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2026, legislation record Albuquerque City Council
  4. Budget City of Albuquerque
  5. FY/27 Proposed Budget City of Albuquerque
  6. City Council's Committee of the Whole Uncovers $11.8M Discrepancy in Mayor's Proposed FY27 Budget Albuquerque City Council
  7. Council says it found $11 million budget error by mayor. He says they don't understand the budget. City Desk ABQ
  8. After mayor warns of budget woes, Council OK's city's biggest budget ever City Desk ABQ
  9. Albuquerque's record $1.5 billion budget heads to the state, without Keller's signature City Desk ABQ
  10. City council approves $1.5B budget for Albuquerque KOB
Cite this story
APA

Duke City Ledger. (2026, August 25). The council set aside $8.2 million for city worker raises. The mayor's office says that money isn't real yet and warned of layoffs. Duke City Ledger. https://dukecityledger.com/news/city-budget-fy27-approved/

MLA

“The council set aside $8.2 million for city worker raises. The mayor's office says that money isn't real yet and warned of layoffs.” Duke City Ledger, 25 Aug. 2026, https://dukecityledger.com/news/city-budget-fy27-approved/.

Chicago

Duke City Ledger. “The council set aside $8.2 million for city worker raises. The mayor's office says that money isn't real yet and warned of layoffs.” Duke City Ledger, August 25, 2026. https://dukecityledger.com/news/city-budget-fy27-approved/.

Credit and republishing guidelines

Know something about this story? Send a tip.

More from the Ledger

All Government →